QQQ vs. FBTC

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQ returned 24.61% vs -44.68% for FBTC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

QQQ vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.63% return.

QQQ

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -5.91%
• 6M: 12.30%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 24.61%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 14.68%
• 10Y*: 20.72%
• ALL TIME*: 10.70%

FBTC

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: -31.89%
• YTD: -25.63%
• 1Y: -44.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	13.58%	20.77%	25.89%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.63%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and FBTC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 51
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQ	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	-1.01	+2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-1.50	+3.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.83	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	-0.84	+2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.22	-1.34	+8.56

QQQ vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.97%	-53.35%	-29.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-53.35%	+41.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-48.20%	+41.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.65%	-17.73%	-14.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	33.39%	-29.97%

Volatility

QQQ vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.41%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	10.58%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.55%	34.53%	-18.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	44.30%	-25.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.81%	49.71%	-26.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.45%	49.71%	-27.26%

QQQ vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQ vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ and FBTC in my portfolio?

QQQ and FBTC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQ or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to QQQ (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs FBTC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, QQQ or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 24.61% vs -44.68% for FBTC. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQ or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 24.61% return vs -44.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQ or FBTC?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQ or FBTC?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between QQQ and FBTC?

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.