PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 20.72%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.32% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
0.10%
1M
-5.91%
6M
12.30%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
20.72%
ALL TIME*
10.70%

FBND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.60%
6M
0.12%
YTD
0.27%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
2.32%
ALL TIME*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
13.58%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.27%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and FBND is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.12

The correlation between QQQ and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.55

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

4.22

+3.00

QQQ vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-17.25%

-65.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-2.66%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-5.61%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-17.25%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-17.25%

-17.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-1.65%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-3.33%

-29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

0.98%

+2.44%

Volatility

QQQ vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

1.07%

+6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

2.92%

+12.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

3.80%

+14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

5.93%

+16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

6.10%

+16.35%

QQQ vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.72%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and FBND have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to FBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.72% vs 2.32% for FBND. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.36% for FBND.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer