PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.60% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed EINC with an annualized return of 20.75%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.76%
6M
18.69%
YTD
17.04%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
20.75%
ALL TIME*
10.80%

EINC

1D
-1.74%
1M
0.75%
6M
14.53%
YTD
24.60%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
26.54%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
11.04%
ALL TIME*
0.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$736.56K$2.64M$2.24M
$34.07B$28.96B$31.85B

QQQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.04%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
24.60%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and EINC is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012

0.30

The correlation between QQQ and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
EINC

Technology

60.9%

-

Communication Services

13.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Healthcare

3.6%

-

Industrials

2.7%
0.6%

Utilities

1.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%
99.5%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQ
60.9%
EINC

-

Communication Services

QQQ
13.1%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
10.7%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.3%
EINC

-

Healthcare

QQQ
3.6%
EINC

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.7%
EINC
0.6%

Utilities

QQQ
1.1%
EINC
0.5%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
EINC

-

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
EINC
99.5%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
EINC

-

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.42

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

8.30

-0.68

QQQ vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and EINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-87.55%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-7.89%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-16.01%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-19.87%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-68.85%

+33.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-5.54%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.61%

-43.81%

+11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.24%

+0.53%

Volatility

QQQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.14%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

5.14%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

12.44%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

15.55%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.97%

19.51%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

25.33%

-2.80%

QQQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than EINC's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
4.31%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to EINC (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.75% vs 11.04% for EINC. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.75% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 0.42% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EINC is Energy Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.46% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer