QQQ vs. DTLA.L
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQ returned 16.85%/yr vs -6.37%/yr for DTLA.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for DTLA.L.
Performance
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than DTLA.L's -0.86% return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -7.49% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.86% | 4.49% | -6.90% | 1.69% | -30.29% | -4.46% | 17.00% | 15.69% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and DTLA.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | -0.02 |
The correlation between QQQ and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
DTLA.L
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.06 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.45 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 1.12 | +10.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than DTLA.L's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and DTLA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -48.41% | -34.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -7.50% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -18.57% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -42.80% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -40.40% | +37.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -24.06% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.00% | +0.20% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 3.33% | +4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 6.74% | +7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 10.03% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 14.95% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 14.79% | +7.59% |
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.07% for DTLA.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and DTLA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer