PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQ vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQ vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-4.65%20.77%25.58%12.10%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
5.99%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 5.99% return.


QQQ

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-3.18%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
19.05%

DARP

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
5.99%
6M
13.15%
1Y
63.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQ vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQDARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

2.16

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

2.70

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.09

-2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.00

16.64

-9.63

QQQ vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and DARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQDARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.16

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.14

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and DARP is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQ vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than DARP's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.41%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and DARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-30.27%

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-11.82%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.75%

-7.61%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.98%

-4.85%

-28.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.91%

-0.43%

Volatility

QQQ vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.38%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

8.97%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

19.19%

-6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.69%

29.50%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

26.39%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

26.39%

-4.15%