QQQ vs. COPX
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for COPX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
QQQ vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 19.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QQQ having a 21.79% annualized return and COPX not far ahead at 21.86%.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 103.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
QQQ vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and COPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.51 |
The correlation between QQQ and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (5 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
COPX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
COPX
-
Communication Services
QQQ
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
COPX
-
Healthcare
QQQ
COPX
-
Industrials
QQQ
COPX
Utilities
QQQ
COPX
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
COPX
Energy
QQQ
COPX
-
Financial Services
QQQ
COPX
-
Real Estate
QQQ
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
COPX
QQQ vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.75 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 11.60 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, roughly equal to the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -83.16% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -27.82% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -39.72% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -42.12% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -65.41% | +30.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -10.17% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -39.28% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 8.98% | -5.78% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 19.30% | -11.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 38.15% | -24.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 43.66% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 37.00% | -14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 35.75% | -13.37% |
QQQ vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than COPX's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and COPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.86% vs 21.79% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 21.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COPX is Materials. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer