QQQ vs. BA.L
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BA.L (BAE Systems plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for BA.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQQ vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQ is traded in USD, while BA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than BA.L's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 21.79%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
BA.L
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- -0.87%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.99%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
QQQ vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 12.20% | 63.60% | 4.12% | 40.34% | 43.72% | 16.51% | -6.51% | 33.58% | -21.46% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and BA.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007 | 0.26 |
The correlation between QQQ and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
BA.L
QQQ vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.03 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.07 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 0.16 | +11.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and BA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -57.18% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -22.64% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -22.64% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -22.64% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -41.57% | +6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -16.88% | +13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -18.54% | -14.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 10.00% | -6.80% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 9.11% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 24.23% | -10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 30.85% | -13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 27.07% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 26.84% | -4.46% |
Dividends
QQQ vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than BA.L's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 1.90% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and BA.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and BA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer