PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQLV vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQLV vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
0.48%4.19%-5.60%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
6.86%13.04%-8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 6.86% return.


QQLV

1D
0.17%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
0.48%
6M
-1.79%
1Y
-1.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
1.85%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
6.86%
6M
9.51%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
18.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQLV vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

1.34

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

1.91

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

2.41

-2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.43

11.42

-11.85

QQLV vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

1.34

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.55

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and XMMO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQLV vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than XMMO's 0.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
1.95%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.70%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and XMMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-55.37%

+45.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-12.81%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-2.62%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-9.52%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.70%

+0.93%

Volatility

QQLV vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) is 3.44%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that QQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQLVXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

9.04%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

14.39%

-7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

22.03%

-8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

21.27%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

22.11%

-9.17%