PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. VCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. VCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than VCRB's 0.47% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-1.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCRB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. VCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
1.94%4.19%-5.60%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.47%7.56%-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and VCRB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. VCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. VCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVVCRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

1.52

-1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

2.27

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.27

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

2.13

-2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.52

6.38

-6.90

QQLV vs. VCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the VCRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and VCRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVVCRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

1.52

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.93

-0.92

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. VCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, which is greater than VCRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and VCRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVVCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-4.59%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-2.63%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-1.40%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-1.16%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

0.88%

+2.85%

Volatility

QQLV vs. VCRB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) at 1.18%. This indicates that QQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVVCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

1.18%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

2.60%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

3.69%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

4.74%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

4.74%

+7.96%

QQLV vs. VCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VCRB's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. VCRB - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than VCRB's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.06%1.84%0.00%0.00%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.60%4.55%4.22%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and VCRB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQLV has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to VCRB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs VCRB's -4.59%.

On 1-year performance, VCRB leads with 5.60% vs -1.95% for QQLV. On fees, VCRB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRB has performed better with a 5.60% return vs -1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.

VCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.06% for QQLV.

QQLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VCRB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.10% for VCRB.

VCRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and VCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer