PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLV's 9.01% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.40%
6M
5.54%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.28%

QLV

1D
0.10%
1M
1.40%
6M
6.81%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$433.57K$400.63K$648.84K
$52.35K$30.06K$34.79K

QQLV vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
7.25%4.19%-5.60%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.01%12.28%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and QLV is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.76

The correlation between QQLV and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQLV vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQLVQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.53

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.84

10.43

-9.59

QQLV vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-33.71%

+24.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.19%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-0.43%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-3.93%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

1.50%

+2.17%

Volatility

QQLV vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.64%. This indicates that QQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

2.64%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

5.96%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

7.88%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

12.63%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.06%

16.43%

-3.37%

QQLV vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.02%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and QLV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQLV has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to QLV (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 1-year performance, QLV leads with 16.12% vs 3.51% for QQLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QLV has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.

QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

QQLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while QLV is Quality Factor. QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer