QQLV vs. PSCX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX).

QQLV and PSCX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Dec 4, 2024. PSCX is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020.

Performance

QQLV vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQLV vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQLV Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF	0.48%	4.19%	-5.60%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	-1.63%	12.08%	0.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's -1.63% return.

QQLV

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: -1.79%
• 1Y: -1.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: -1.63%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

PSCX

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF

QQLV

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

QQLV vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV

QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 9
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 77
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQLV	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	1.38	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	2.06	-2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.33	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	2.00	-2.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	10.18	-10.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQLV vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and PSCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQLV	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	1.38	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	1.11	-1.18

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and PSCX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QQLV vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
QQLV Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF	1.95%	1.84%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQLV	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.54%	-10.20%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-6.15%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.98%	-2.58%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-1.92%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	1.21%	+2.42%

Volatility

QQLV vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 2.82%. This indicates that QQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQLV	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	2.82%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.03%	4.31%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	8.83%	+4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.94%	7.06%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.94%	7.02%	+5.92%