QQLV vs. IUS
QQLV (Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Invesco - QQLV tracks the Nasdaq Low Volatility Index while IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQLV returned -1.95% vs 33.27% for IUS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
QQLV vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.
QQLV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QQLV vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQLV Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF | 1.94% | 4.19% | -5.60% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 15.71% | 16.94% | -4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQLV and IUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between QQLV and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQLV vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
QQLV
IUS
QQLV vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQLV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.60 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 5.44 | -5.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 23.27 | -23.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQLV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 3.26 | -3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.85 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
QQLV vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQLV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -34.67% | +25.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -6.15% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -0.07% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -3.86% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 1.43% | +2.30% |
Volatility
QQLV vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that QQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQLV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.50% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 7.41% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 10.26% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 15.00% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 18.04% | -5.34% |
QQLV vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQLV vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than IUS's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
QQLV Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF | 2.06% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQLV and IUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQLV has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs IUS's -34.67%.
On 1-year performance, IUS leads with 33.27% vs -1.95% for QQLV. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IUS has performed better with a 33.27% return vs -1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.
QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.28% for IUS.
QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.19% for IUS.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQLV and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer