QQI.TO vs. KNG
QQI.TO (BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. QQI.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQI.TO is traded in CAD, while KNG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KNG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQI.TO achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 11.21% return.
QQI.TO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 6M
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | -16.04% | -3.15% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 11.21% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQI.TO and KNG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQI.TO vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
QQI.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQI.TO | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQI.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQI.TO and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQI.TO | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -29.00% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.72% | -0.34% | -24.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.40% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQI.TO | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 11.31% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 14.76% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 18.06% | +2.20% |
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQI.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQI.TO vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.32% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQI.TO and KNG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for QQI.TO.
QQI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KNG is Dividend. QQI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for QQI.TO and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for QQI.TO and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer