PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQHG vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQHG vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
-1.76%20.59%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
6.86%16.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 6.86% return.


QQHG

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-1.76%
6M
0.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
1.85%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
6.86%
6M
9.51%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
18.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQHG vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQHG vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

0.55

+1.62

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and XMMO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQHG vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than XMMO's 0.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.23%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.70%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and XMMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-55.37%

+49.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-2.62%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-9.52%

+8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

Volatility

QQHG vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQHGXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.60%

22.03%

-12.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.60%

21.27%

-11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.60%

22.11%

-12.51%