QQHG vs. TRIO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) and TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQHG returned 26.43% vs 14.67% for TRIO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQHG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TRIO.

Performance

QQHG vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than TRIO's 5.46% return.

QQHG

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 11.43%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRIO

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	11.43%	20.59%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	5.46%	12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and TRIO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025	0.86

The correlation between QQHG and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQHG vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG

QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 84
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 77
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQHG	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.40	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.54	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.48	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	3.30	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.07	16.55	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQHG vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQHG	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.40	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.35	1.35	+2.01

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum TRIO drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and TRIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQHG	TRIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-9.88%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-4.47%	-1.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.17%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-0.79%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	0.89%	+0.66%

Volatility

QQHG vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) at 1.01%. This indicates that QQHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQHG	TRIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	1.01%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.66%	4.77%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47%	6.14%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	10.71%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.53%	10.71%	-1.18%

QQHG vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQHG vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than TRIO's 8.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.20%	0.17%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.54%	9.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQHG and TRIO in my portfolio?

QQHG and TRIO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQHG or TRIO?

QQHG has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to TRIO (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

Which ETF is better, QQHG or TRIO?

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 14.67% for TRIO. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQHG or TRIO?

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQHG or TRIO?

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TRIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQHG or TRIO?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.54%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

What is the main difference between QQHG and TRIO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ETF Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.70% for TRIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.