QQDN vs. TSLZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. QQDN is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, QQDN returned -34.59% vs -66.66% for TSLZ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQDN charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.

Performance

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -8.55% return.

QQDN

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -4.79%
• 6M: -11.62%
• YTD: -11.94%
• 1Y: -34.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLZ

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -7.82%
• 6M: -9.36%
• YTD: -8.55%
• 1Y: -66.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	-11.94%	-34.51%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	-8.55%	-63.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QQDN and TSLZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.54

The correlation between QQDN and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQDN vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQDN

QQDN Risk / Return Rank: 2
QQDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
QQDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
QQDN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
QQDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QQDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQDN	TSLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	-0.77	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	-1.13	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.88	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.97	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	-1.23	-0.18

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQDN and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and TSLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQDN	TSLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.19%	-99.11%	+48.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.68%	-69.73%	+26.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.46%	-99.04%	+55.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.01%	-76.11%	+45.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.15%	54.96%	-29.81%

Volatility

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) is 14.19%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 35.63%. This indicates that QQDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQDN	TSLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.19%	35.63%	-21.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.46%	62.61%	-31.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.32%	88.44%	-48.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.82%	117.17%	-77.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.82%	117.17%	-77.35%

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQDN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQDN vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than TSLZ's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega	5.59%	3.42%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.75%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQDN and TSLZ in my portfolio?

QQDN and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQDN or TSLZ?

TSLZ has higher volatility (35.63%) compared to QQDN (14.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQDN dropped -50.19% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

Which ETF is better, QQDN or TSLZ?

On 1-year performance, QQDN leads with -34.59% vs -66.66% for TSLZ. On fees, QQDN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQDN has been the lower-risk option at 14.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQDN or TSLZ?

Over the 1-year period, QQDN has performed better with a -34.59% return vs -66.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQDN or TSLZ?

QQDN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQDN or TSLZ?

QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.75% for TSLZ.

What is the main difference between QQDN and TSLZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQDN and 1.05% for TSLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.