PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQDN vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQDN vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -17.46% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -28.44% return.


QQDN

1D
-0.14%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-17.46%
6M
-13.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-22.52%
YTD
-28.44%
6M
-32.46%
1Y
-41.98%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQDN vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQDN
ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega
-17.46%-34.14%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.44%-20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QQDN and BITO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQDN vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQDN

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQDN vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQDN vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQDNBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.21

-0.10

-1.11

Drawdowns

QQDN vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQDNBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.19%

-77.86%

+27.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.00%

-50.64%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-36.75%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.27%

Volatility

QQDN vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQDNBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.51%

43.61%

-5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.51%

55.10%

-16.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.51%

55.10%

-16.59%

QQDN vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQDN and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

QQDN vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than BITO's 69.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
69.59%78.29%61.59%15.14%
QQDN
ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega
4.93%3.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQDN and BITO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQDN and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 4.93% for QQDN.

QQDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQDN and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer