QQCI.TO vs. QQQI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI).

QQCI.TO and QQQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQCI.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2025. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	-2.67%	12.64%	11.70%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	-3.12%	13.18%	13.72%

Different Trading Currencies

QQCI.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's -3.12% return.

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: 0.24%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -3.12%
• 6M: -1.70%
• 1Y: 16.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.87	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.33	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.20	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.55	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.92	5.51	+0.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.87	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.01	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and QQQI is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, less than QQQI's 15.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	9.81%	9.34%	3.17%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	15.05%	13.82%	12.85%

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQI drawdown of -19.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-20.00%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-11.46%	+0.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.14%	-6.66%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-2.31%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	2.52%	+0.43%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 4.86%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	6.00%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.74%	11.13%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.42%	19.41%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	17.12%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.77%	17.12%	-1.35%