QQCI.TO vs. QQQI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQCI.TO is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 29.53% vs 26.56% for QQQI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQCI.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 14.17% return.

QQCI.TO

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 1.23%
• 6M: 13.08%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 1.20%
• 6M: 10.65%
• YTD: 14.17%
• 1Y: 26.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	15.98%	12.64%	11.81%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.17%	13.21%	13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and QQQI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	0.69

The correlation between QQCI.TO and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCI.TO	QQQI
Technology	59.6%	58.1%
Communication Services	14.0%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	6.5%
Healthcare	3.6%	3.9%
Industrials	2.6%	3.0%
Utilities	1.1%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 56
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.70	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.33	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	2.92	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.21	10.33	+2.87

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQI drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-19.93%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-9.13%	+1.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-2.74%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-2.55%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.58%	-0.34%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 5.78%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCI.TO	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	7.60%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	13.09%	-1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.42%	15.69%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	18.18%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	18.18%	-2.33%

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, less than QQQI's 13.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	8.82%	9.34%	3.17%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.76%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCI.TO and QQQI in my portfolio?

QQCI.TO and QQQI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between QQCI.TO and QQQI?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos.