QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO
QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and CLML.TO (CI Global Climate Leaders Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI, while CLML.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 24.09% vs 32.66% for CLML.TO. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQCI.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CLML.TO.
Performance
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than CLML.TO's 24.04% return.
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.32%
CLML.TO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$201.36K | CA$413.19K | CA$399.09K | |
| CA$141.03K | CA$115.67K | CA$152.23K |
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 11.99% | 12.64% | 11.81% |
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 24.04% | 25.21% | 14.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCI.TO and CLML.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QQCI.TO and CLML.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCI.TO
CLML.TO
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQCI.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.97 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 7.95 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum CLML.TO drawdown of -28.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and CLML.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCI.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -28.17% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -15.61% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -11.92% | +6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -8.87% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.86% | -1.30% |
Volatility
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 4.91%, while CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQCI.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 7.85% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 19.77% | -8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 23.72% | -8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 21.27% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 21.17% | -5.25% |
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQCI.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CLML.TO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQCI.TO vs. CLML.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, while CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQCI.TO and CLML.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CLML.TO.
QQCI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CLML.TO is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCI.TO and 0.99% for CLML.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQCI.TO and CLML.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer