QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Invesco tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC-F.TO returned 14.46%/yr vs 19.42%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.43% return.

QQC-F.TO

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 15.03%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 32.18%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 20.46%

QQQM

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 20.43%
• 6M: 18.43%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 29.31%
• 5Y*: 19.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	15.03%	18.79%	24.19%	52.81%	-33.42%	27.15%	9.63%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	20.43%	15.33%	36.33%	51.32%	-28.24%	27.39%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQQM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.91

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQC-F.TO	QQQM
Technology	59.6%	58.7%
Communication Services	14.0%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	6.4%
Healthcare	3.6%	3.7%
Industrials	2.6%	2.6%
Utilities	1.1%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO

QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQC-F.TO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.18	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.86	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.22	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	10.41	-1.41

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC-F.TO	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-32.26%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-12.21%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	-22.57%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	-32.26%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.29%	-3.41%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-7.54%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.77%	-0.18%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) is 8.59%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC-F.TO	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.59%	9.28%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.25%	14.73%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	18.09%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.72%	23.29%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	23.21%	-0.56%

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.34%	0.39%	0.50%	0.57%	0.89%	0.66%	0.49%	0.64%	0.77%	0.66%	0.81%	0.76%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC-F.TO and QQQM in my portfolio?

QQC-F.TO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC-F.TO or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC-F.TO or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC-F.TO and QQQM?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.15% for QQQM.