QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS).
QQC-F.TO and MON100.NS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQC-F.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021. MON100.NS is a passively managed fund by Motilal Oswal that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both QQC-F.TO and MON100.NS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QQC-F.TO or MON100.NS.
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and MON100.NS is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QQC-F.TO:
0.38
MON100.NS:
0.73
QQC-F.TO:
0.71
MON100.NS:
1.13
QQC-F.TO:
1.10
MON100.NS:
1.16
QQC-F.TO:
0.41
MON100.NS:
0.72
QQC-F.TO:
1.39
MON100.NS:
2.11
QQC-F.TO:
6.79%
MON100.NS:
8.79%
QQC-F.TO:
24.98%
MON100.NS:
25.52%
QQC-F.TO:
-36.02%
MON100.NS:
-36.27%
QQC-F.TO:
-12.88%
MON100.NS:
-22.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly higher than MON100.NS's -20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO has underperformed MON100.NS with an annualized return of 15.30%, while MON100.NS has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return.
QQC-F.TO
-8.01%
-2.75%
-5.33%
10.20%
16.50%
15.30%
MON100.NS
-20.20%
-7.69%
2.93%
20.12%
21.87%
19.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MON100.NS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QQC-F.TO
MON100.NS
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while MON100.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 1.03% |
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.02%, roughly equal to the maximum MON100.NS drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and MON100.NS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.41% compared to Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) at 8.54%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MON100.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.