PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly lower than PXS.TO's 18.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO has outperformed PXS.TO with an annualized return of 20.71%, while PXS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.58% annualized return.


QQC-F.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
15.07%
6M
13.35%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
14.51%
10Y*
20.71%

PXS.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.93%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.60%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
16.09%
10Y*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
15.07%18.79%24.19%52.81%-33.42%27.15%45.04%37.63%-2.23%31.94%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
18.28%13.64%26.23%12.41%-2.47%32.84%4.71%21.47%-1.23%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2015

0.31

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQC-F.TO
PXS.TO

Technology

59.6%
24.6%

Communication Services

14.0%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.8%

Healthcare

3.6%
11.5%

Industrials

2.6%
8.8%

Utilities

1.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.3%

Energy

0.5%
7.7%

Financial Services

0.2%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.4%

Technology

QQC-F.TO
59.6%
PXS.TO
24.6%

Communication Services

QQC-F.TO
14.0%
PXS.TO
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QQC-F.TO
11.1%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

QQC-F.TO
6.3%
PXS.TO
5.8%

Healthcare

QQC-F.TO
3.6%
PXS.TO
11.5%

Industrials

QQC-F.TO
2.6%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Utilities

QQC-F.TO
1.1%
PXS.TO
2.8%

Basic Materials

QQC-F.TO
1.0%
PXS.TO
3.3%

Energy

QQC-F.TO
0.5%
PXS.TO
7.7%

Financial Services

QQC-F.TO
0.2%
PXS.TO
14.7%

Real Estate

QQC-F.TO
0.1%
PXS.TO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQC-F.TOPXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.63

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

7.34

-5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

26.12

-17.78

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than PXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC-F.TOPXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-31.87%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-4.88%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

-16.36%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-16.36%

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

-31.87%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-0.12%

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-3.35%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.37%

+2.24%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) at 3.07%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC-F.TOPXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

3.07%

+5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

8.35%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

11.07%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

13.29%

+9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

15.28%

+7.36%

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PXS.TO's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. PXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PXS.TO's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
1.22%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.34%0.39%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PXS.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.46% for PXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and PXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer