QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while KNGC.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQC-F.TO returned 38.43% vs 55.50% for KNGC.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KNGC.TO.

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than KNGC.TO's 18.75% return.

QQC-F.TO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 10.71%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 16.33%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

KNGC.TO

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 18.75%
• 6M: 19.23%
• 1Y: 55.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	19.79%	18.41%	12.40%
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF	18.75%	41.07%	176,983.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO

QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

KNGC.TO

KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC-F.TO	KNGC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	4.54	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	6.34	-3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.92	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	14.41	-11.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.91	52.56	-41.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC-F.TO	KNGC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	4.54	-2.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.04	+0.88

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC-F.TO	KNGC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-20.25%	-15.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-3.87%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.75%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-3.09%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	1.06%	+2.47%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC-F.TO	KNGC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	2.31%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	9.01%	+3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.89%	12.30%	+3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.45%	123,156.10%	-123,133.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.54%	123,156.10%	-123,133.56%

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF	1.62%	1.69%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.00%	0.09%	0.50%	0.57%	0.89%	0.66%	0.49%	0.64%	0.77%	0.66%	0.81%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO in my portfolio?

QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC-F.TO or KNGC.TO?

On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC-F.TO or KNGC.TO?

KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC-F.TO and KNGC.TO?

QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KNGC.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.17% for KNGC.TO.