PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQA vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.56% return.


QQA

1D
-1.80%
1M
0.69%
YTD
12.34%
6M
11.54%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
-1.30%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
5.56%
6M
4.95%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
12.34%17.24%5.92%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
5.56%16.67%5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and SPYI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024

0.90

The correlation between QQA and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQA vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQA
SPYI

Technology

58.7%
39.1%

Communication Services

14.3%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.3%

Industrials

2.6%
7.8%

Utilities

1.2%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.7%

Energy

0.5%
3.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

QQA
58.7%
SPYI
39.1%

Communication Services

QQA
14.3%
SPYI
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QQA
11.4%
SPYI
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQA
6.4%
SPYI
4.5%

Healthcare

QQA
3.7%
SPYI
8.3%

Industrials

QQA
2.6%
SPYI
7.8%

Utilities

QQA
1.2%
SPYI
2.1%

Basic Materials

QQA
1.0%
SPYI
1.7%

Energy

QQA
0.5%
SPYI
3.1%

Financial Services

QQA
0.2%
SPYI
11.1%

Real Estate

QQA
0.1%
SPYI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQA vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQASPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.48

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

12.37

+1.53

QQA vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQA vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQASPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-16.47%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-7.72%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-2.49%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-1.81%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.54%

+0.49%

Volatility

QQA vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 4.27%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQASPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

4.27%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

8.32%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

10.34%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

13.02%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

13.02%

+5.57%

QQA vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQA vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, less than SPYI's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.70%9.78%4.29%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
13.02%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QQA and SPYI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQA has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to SPYI (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 28.19% vs 19.05% for SPYI. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 28.19% return vs 19.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.

SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 13.02%, compared with 9.70% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.68% for SPYI.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQA and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer