QQA vs. SPMO
QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. QQA is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 32.22% vs 46.00% for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QQA vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
QQA vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 7.11% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQA and SPMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QQA and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQA vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQA
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQA
SPMO
Communication Services
QQA
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
QQA
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
QQA
SPMO
Healthcare
QQA
SPMO
Industrials
QQA
SPMO
Utilities
QQA
SPMO
Basic Materials
QQA
SPMO
Energy
QQA
SPMO
Financial Services
QQA
SPMO
Real Estate
QQA
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQA vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQA
SPMO
QQA vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.62 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 3.54 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.64 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 14.17 | +2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
QQA vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -30.95% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -12.70% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -4.60% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.26% | -1.31% |
Volatility
QQA vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is 2.91%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that QQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 7.35% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 14.39% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 17.64% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 19.30% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 20.31% | -2.04% |
QQA vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQA vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQA and SPMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to QQA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 46.00% vs 32.22% for QQA. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 46.00% return vs 32.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QQA.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
QQA is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQA and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer