QQA vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 28.19% vs 22.07% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.

Performance

QQA vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 7.99% return.

QQA

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.34%	17.24%	5.92%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.99%	16.25%	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and GPIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024	0.89

The correlation between QQA and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQA vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQA	GPIX
Technology	58.7%	39.2%
Communication Services	14.3%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	4.4%
Healthcare	3.7%	8.3%
Industrials	2.6%	7.7%
Utilities	1.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	10.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QQA vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQA	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.05	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.81	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.39	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	2.88	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	13.99	-0.08

QQA vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQA vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQA	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-17.50%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-7.71%	-1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-2.22%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.48%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.58%	+0.45%

Volatility

QQA vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.26%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQA	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	4.26%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	8.75%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	10.82%	+3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	13.89%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	13.89%	+4.70%

QQA vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQA and GPIX have an expense ratio of 0.29%.

Dividends

QQA vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than GPIX's 8.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.14%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.70%	9.78%	4.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQA and GPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QQA and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQA or GPIX?

QQA has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to GPIX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, QQA or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 28.19% vs 22.07% for GPIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQA or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 28.19% return vs 22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQA or GPIX?

QQA and GPIX have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQA or GPIX?

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.70%, compared with 8.14% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between QQA and GPIX?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.