QPFF vs. PGF
QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) and PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. QPFF is actively managed, while PGF is passively managed. QPFF charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PGF.
Performance
QPFF vs. PGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
QPFF vs. PGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -1.71% |
QPFF vs. PGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPFF
PGF
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
QPFF
PGF
Utilities
QPFF
PGF
-
Real Estate
QPFF
PGF
-
Communication Services
QPFF
PGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
QPFF
PGF
-
Industrials
QPFF
PGF
-
Basic Materials
QPFF
PGF
-
Consumer Defensive
QPFF
-
PGF
-
Energy
QPFF
-
PGF
-
Healthcare
QPFF
-
PGF
-
Technology
QPFF
-
PGF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPFF vs. PGF — Risk / Return Rank
QPFF
PGF
QPFF vs. PGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPFF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.15 | — |
Drawdowns
QPFF vs. PGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPFF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PGF drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPFF and PGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPFF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -75.69% | +75.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.38% | +5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -7.01% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
QPFF vs. PGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPFF | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 6.28% | -6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 11.36% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.00% | -12.00% |
QPFF vs. PGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPFF has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PGF's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPFF vs. PGF - Dividend Comparison
QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.33% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for QPFF and 0.62% for PGF.
Find the right allocation for QPFF and PGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer