PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPFF vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPFF vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QPFF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVES

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.15%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPFF vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


QPFF vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPFF
AVES

Financial Services

51.6%
25.3%

Utilities

5.5%
1.7%

Real Estate

4.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
9.6%

Industrials

1.2%
13.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.2%

Energy

-

4.0%

Healthcare

-

2.1%

Technology

-

21.4%

Financial Services

QPFF
51.6%
AVES
25.3%

Utilities

QPFF
5.5%
AVES
1.7%

Real Estate

QPFF
4.1%
AVES
2.4%

Communication Services

QPFF
3.6%
AVES
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QPFF
2.1%
AVES
9.6%

Industrials

QPFF
1.2%
AVES
13.3%

Basic Materials

QPFF
0.3%
AVES
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

QPFF

-

AVES
3.2%

Energy

QPFF

-

AVES
4.0%

Healthcare

QPFF

-

AVES
2.1%

Technology

QPFF

-

AVES
21.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPFF vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPFF

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPFF vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QPFF vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPFFAVESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

QPFF vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPFF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AVES drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPFF and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPFFAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-27.40%

+27.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.36%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-7.73%

+7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

Volatility

QPFF vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPFFAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

17.19%

-17.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

16.98%

-16.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

16.98%

-16.98%

QPFF vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPFF has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPFF vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.81%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%
QPFF
American Century Quality Preferred ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.

QPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for QPFF and 0.36% for AVES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPFF and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer