QOWZ vs. USFR
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned -4.42% vs 3.99% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
QOWZ vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -8.29% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.82% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -9.37%
- 1Y
- -4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
QOWZ vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -8.29% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 5.69% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and USFR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
USFR
QOWZ vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QOWZ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 13.31 | -12.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 201.33 | -201.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 779.76 | -780.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -1.36% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -0.02% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.78% | 0.00% | -11.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -0.15% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 0.01% | +7.02% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that QOWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 0.09% | +6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 0.19% | +12.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 0.27% | +15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 0.40% | +18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 0.78% | +18.52% |
QOWZ vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.27% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and USFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QOWZ has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 1-year performance, USFR leads with 3.99% vs -4.42% for QOWZ. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFR has performed better with a 3.99% return vs -4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.27% for QOWZ.
QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer