PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNXT vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNXT vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNXT vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
-4.65%14.97%-2.52%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%36.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


QNXT

1D
2.43%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-5.48%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QNXT vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QNXT vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNXTIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

-0.40

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

-0.29

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.97

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.39

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

-0.83

+4.40

QNXT vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNXT and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNXTIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

-0.40

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.35

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and IBIT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QNXT vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.72%0.64%0.22%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNXTIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.25%

-49.36%

+27.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-49.36%

+36.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-46.11%

+38.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-14.13%

+10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

23.09%

-19.68%

Volatility

QNXT vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is 5.71%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that QNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNXTIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

12.99%

-7.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

36.75%

-25.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

45.42%

-24.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

51.26%

-30.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

51.26%

-30.96%