QNXT vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
QNXT and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNXT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005. Both QNXT and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QNXT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QNXT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | -4.65% | 14.97% | -2.52% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 8.61% | 63.95% | -4.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 8.61% return.
QNXT
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -4.65%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QNXT vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QNXT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
QNXT
IAU
QNXT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QNXT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.80 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.24 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.69 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 9.97 | -6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QNXT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.80 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between QNXT and IAU is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QNXT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.22% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QNXT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and IAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNXT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -45.14% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -19.18% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -13.20% | +5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -15.98% | +11.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 5.18% | -1.77% |
Volatility
QNXT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is 5.71%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that QNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QNXT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 11.02% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 24.11% | -12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 27.62% | -6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 17.69% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 15.82% | +4.48% |