QNXT vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QNXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QNXT returned 25.34% vs 29.18% for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QNXT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

QNXT vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return.

QNXT

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.67%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNXT vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	15.67%	14.97%	-2.52%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and ACWI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024	0.85

The correlation between QNXT and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QNXT vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QNXT	ACWI
Technology	40.3%	29.4%
Consumer Cyclical	17.0%	9.3%
Industrials	10.6%	10.9%
Communication Services	8.8%	9.0%
Healthcare	7.5%	8.1%
Utilities	6.1%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	5.0%
Energy	2.7%	4.2%
Financial Services	1.0%	16.1%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.8%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

QNXT vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT

QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 49
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QNXT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.29	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.17	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.01	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.17	13.53	-5.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QNXT vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNXT and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNXT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.29	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.43	+0.47

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNXT	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-56.00%	+33.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-9.73%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.83%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-8.61%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.16%	+0.95%

Volatility

QNXT vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that QNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QNXT	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	3.93%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	10.29%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	12.78%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	16.05%	+3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	17.11%	+2.62%

QNXT vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

QNXT vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNXT and ACWI in my portfolio?

QNXT and ACWI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QNXT or ACWI?

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to QNXT (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QNXT dropped -22.25% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, QNXT or ACWI?

On 1-year performance, ACWI leads with 29.18% vs 25.34% for QNXT. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QNXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QNXT or ACWI?

Over the 1-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 25.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNXT or ACWI?

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNXT or ACWI?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.

What is the main difference between QNXT and ACWI?

QNXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ACWI is Global Equities. QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QNXT and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.