QNTG.L vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
QNTG.L and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2004. Both QNTG.L and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | -6.88% | 18.84% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | -4.61% | 24.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while VGT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VGT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's -4.61% return.
QNTG.L
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -6.88%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -4.31%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.81%
- 10Y*
- 22.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QNTG.L vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
QNTG.L
VGT
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QNTG.L | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between QNTG.L and VGT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and VGT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNTG.L | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -54.63% | +31.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.84% | -11.66% | -8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -8.00% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.35% | — |
Volatility
QNTG.L vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QNTG.L | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.42% | 27.35% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 23.76% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 24.31% | +3.11% |