QNTG.L vs. GDXJ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).

QNTG.L and GDXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. Both QNTG.L and GDXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	-6.88%	18.84%
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF	11.90%	83.19%

Different Trading Currencies

QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while GDXJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDXJ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 11.90% return.

QNTG.L

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: -6.88%
• 6M: -7.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXJ

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: -18.29%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 30.43%
• 1Y: 119.51%
• 3Y*: 46.11%
• 5Y*: 24.81%
• 10Y*: 18.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.

GDXJ

VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF

QNTG.L

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc

Return for Risk

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 92
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNTG.L	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.11	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between QNTG.L and GDXJ is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.12%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Drawdowns

QNTG.L vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -87.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNTG.L	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.25%	-88.66%	+65.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.84%	-19.81%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-60.90%	+52.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNTG.L	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.42%	48.34%	-20.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.42%	37.37%	-9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.42%	42.66%	-15.24%