QMOM vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
QMOM and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QMOM is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Quantity Momentum (USD)(TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both QMOM and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QMOM or VT.
Key characteristics
| QMOM | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.94% | 9.76% |
| 1Y Return | 35.44% | 22.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.79% | 5.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.12% | 11.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.93 | 2.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.02% | 11.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.13% | -50.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.29% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMOM and VT is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
QMOM vs. VT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QMOM achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 9.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QMOM vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMOM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QMOM vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QMOM vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VT's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.74% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 2.03% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
QMOM vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMOM and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QMOM vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.17%. This indicates that QMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.