PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMID vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMID vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 10.01% return.


QMID

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.74%
YTD
2.79%
6M
2.15%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRW

1D
0.27%
1M
4.42%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
2.79%5.02%9.33%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
10.01%12.17%14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and DGRW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.82

The correlation between QMID and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMID
DGRW

Industrials

23.6%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

18.2%
7.1%

Technology

16.3%
32.1%

Healthcare

14.5%
12.8%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.7%

Energy

3.3%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.2%

Industrials

QMID
23.6%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QMID
18.2%
DGRW
7.1%

Technology

QMID
16.3%
DGRW
32.1%

Healthcare

QMID
14.5%
DGRW
12.8%

Financial Services

QMID
12.5%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

QMID
6.4%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

QMID
3.3%
DGRW
5.0%

Communication Services

QMID
3.1%
DGRW
10.1%

Basic Materials

QMID
2.1%
DGRW
3.3%

Real Estate

QMID

-

DGRW

-

Utilities

QMID

-

DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMID vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMIDDGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

2.30

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

3.35

-1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.76

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.13

12.13

-8.00

QMID vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMIDDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.30

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.86

-0.46

Drawdowns

QMID vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMIDDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-32.04%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-8.30%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

0.00%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-3.01%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.89%

+1.23%

Volatility

QMID vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.34%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMIDDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.34%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

7.61%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

9.84%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

13.96%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

16.21%

+2.32%

QMID vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMID vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
0.50%0.51%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMID and DGRW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMID has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DGRW (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 1-year performance, DGRW leads with 22.57% vs 13.12% for QMID. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 22.57% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.50% for QMID.

QMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMID and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer