PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMHNX vs. AQRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and AQR Multi-Asset Fund Class N (AQRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHNX achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than AQRNX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, QMHNX has underperformed AQRNX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while AQRNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


QMHNX

1D
1.85%
1M
1.14%
YTD
16.75%
6M
19.58%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
5.40%

AQRNX

1D
0.69%
1M
2.90%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.98%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
16.75%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-14.59%-2.06%
AQRNX
AQR Multi-Asset Fund Class N
10.43%18.46%10.07%11.38%-10.73%14.06%2.41%21.98%-7.22%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHNX and AQRNX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.06

Over the past year, QMHNX and AQRNX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMHNX vs. AQRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AQRNX
AQRNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AQRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AQRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and AQR Multi-Asset Fund Class N (AQRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMHNXAQRNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

2.49

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.43

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.13

3.22

+3.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.00

13.59

+7.41

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the AQRNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHNX and AQRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMHNXAQRNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.49

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.80

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.86

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Drawdowns

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHNX drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than AQRNX's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHNX and AQRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMHNXAQRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-19.37%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-7.43%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-11.09%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-19.37%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.34%

-19.37%

-15.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-4.89%

-13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.76%

-0.13%

Volatility

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to AQR Multi-Asset Fund Class N (AQRNX) at 2.72%. This indicates that QMHNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMHNXAQRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

2.72%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

7.70%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

9.67%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

10.65%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

9.78%

+5.69%

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHNX has a 4.12% expense ratio, which is higher than AQRNX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMHNX vs. AQRNX - Dividend Comparison

QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than AQRNX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQRNX
AQR Multi-Asset Fund Class N
3.33%3.67%1.44%2.18%6.67%6.21%0.72%7.45%7.08%10.27%6.78%2.51%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.62%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMHNX and AQRNX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHNX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to AQRNX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHNX dropped -40.29% vs AQRNX's -19.37%.

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMHNX and AQRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer