PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMHIX vs. QMHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QMHIX having a 19.09% return and QMHNX slightly lower at 18.97%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QMHIX having a 5.86% annualized return and QMHNX not far behind at 5.60%.


QMHIX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.36%
YTD
19.09%
6M
22.29%
1Y
35.13%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
5.86%

QMHNX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.34%
YTD
18.97%
6M
22.10%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
19.09%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%1.82%-14.44%-1.72%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
18.97%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-14.59%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHIX and QMHNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

1.00

The correlation between QMHIX and QMHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMHIX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMHIXQMHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.40

7.34

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.80

21.53

+0.27

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHIX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMHIXQMHNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.94

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.36

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHIX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, roughly equal to the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHIX and QMHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMHIXQMHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-40.29%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-4.81%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-19.23%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-19.23%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-35.34%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-18.28%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.63%

0.00%

Volatility

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMHIXQMHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.78%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

9.63%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.74%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.31%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.47%

+0.04%

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMHIX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than QMHNX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.72%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.59%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QMHIX and QMHNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QMHIX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to QMHNX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHIX dropped -39.37% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

QMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMHIX and QMHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer