PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMHIX vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHIX achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.77% return.


QMHIX

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.92%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
5.27%

DBMF

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.08%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
14.01%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%-1.21%
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
10.77%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHIX and DBMF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.51

The correlation between QMHIX and DBMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMHIX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMHIXDBMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

4.55

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.54

16.25

+3.30

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHIX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHIX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHIX and DBMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMHIXDBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-20.39%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-6.10%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-15.60%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-20.39%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-1.46%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-6.55%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.70%

-0.05%

Volatility

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.85%. This indicates that QMHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMHIXDBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

2.85%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

10.05%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

12.42%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

12.52%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

12.40%

+3.12%

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMHIX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than DBMF's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.17%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.80%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMHIX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHIX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to DBMF (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHIX dropped -39.37% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

QMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMHIX and DBMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer