QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO
QMAX.TO (Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and MTRX.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. QMAX.TO is actively managed, while MTRX.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, QMAX.TO returned 44.35% vs 86.01% for MTRX.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MTRX.TO.
Performance
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMAX.TO achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly lower than MTRX.TO's 39.15% return.
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTRX.TO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 39.15%
- 6M
- 40.85%
- 1Y
- 86.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 22.06% | 15.86% |
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF | 39.15% | 37.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMAX.TO and MTRX.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between QMAX.TO and MTRX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QMAX.TO
MTRX.TO
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMAX.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.47 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 5.85 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | 20.13 | -14.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMAX.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.96 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 2.08 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than MTRX.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and MTRX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMAX.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -19.75% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.86% | -14.79% | -8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -4.05% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 4.29% | +4.07% |
Volatility
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) is 6.48%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that QMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTRX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMAX.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 9.59% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 23.57% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.53% | 29.18% | -8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 31.82% | -8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 31.82% | -8.16% |
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MTRX.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMAX.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Dividend Comparison
QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than MTRX.TO's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.33% | 10.79% | 10.90% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMAX.TO and MTRX.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTRX.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTRX.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QMAX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QMAX.TO and 0.49% for MTRX.TO.
Find the right allocation for QMAX.TO and MTRX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer