MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MTRX.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF) and CIF.TO (iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTRX.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index, while CIF.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MTRX.TO returned 86.01% vs 35.22% for CIF.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTRX.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CIF.TO.

Performance

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 39.15% return, which is significantly higher than CIF.TO's 25.20% return.

MTRX.TO

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 39.15%
• 6M: 40.85%
• 1Y: 86.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIF.TO

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 25.20%
• 6M: 16.23%
• 1Y: 35.22%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 18.52%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF	39.15%	37.29%
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF	25.20%	15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRX.TO and CIF.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.51

The correlation between MTRX.TO and CIF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRX.TO

MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CIF.TO

CIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTRX.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	2.33	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.13	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.43	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.85	3.72	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	13.46	+6.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRX.TO and CIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTRX.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	2.33	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.08	0.54	+1.54

Drawdowns

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum CIF.TO drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and CIF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRX.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.75%	-42.37%	+22.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-9.50%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.76%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-5.66%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	2.63%	+1.66%

Volatility

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) at 5.85%. This indicates that MTRX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRX.TO	CIF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	5.85%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.57%	12.44%	+11.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.18%	15.23%	+13.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.82%	14.56%	+17.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.82%	16.69%	+15.13%

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRX.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRX.TO vs. CIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CIF.TO's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF	1.77%	2.05%	2.84%	2.36%	2.53%	2.24%	2.06%	1.83%	2.45%	2.27%	1.81%	2.41%
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRX.TO and CIF.TO in my portfolio?

MTRX.TO and CIF.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTRX.TO or CIF.TO?

On fees, MTRX.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRX.TO or CIF.TO?

MTRX.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CIF.TO.

What is the main difference between MTRX.TO and CIF.TO?

MTRX.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CIF.TO is Energy Equities. MTRX.TO tracks Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index, while CIF.TO tracks Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MTRX.TO and 0.72% for CIF.TO.