PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than XCHP.TO's 13.74% return.


MTRX.TO

1D
3.22%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
15.92%
6M
18.12%
1Y
82.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCHP.TO

1D
2.81%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
13.74%
6M
22.22%
1Y
77.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRX.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHP.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRX.TO
MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTRX.TOXCHP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

1.94

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

2.55

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

2.46

+3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.05

9.06

+10.00

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRX.TO and XCHP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTRX.TOXCHP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.94

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

1.03

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between MTRX.TO and XCHP.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Dividend Comparison

MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XCHP.TO's 0.37% yield.


TTM202520242023
MTRX.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
0.37%0.43%0.29%0.17%

Drawdowns

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum XCHP.TO drawdown of -38.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and XCHP.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRX.TOXCHP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-38.95%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-17.39%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.03%

-6.55%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-9.24%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

6.70%

-2.37%

Volatility

MTRX.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) have volatilities of 13.19% and 12.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTRX.TOXCHP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

12.71%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.53%

26.42%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.63%

41.01%

-10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

38.21%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.67%

38.21%

-6.54%