PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
-15.25%16.57%37.65%16.15%
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
-2.43%18.64%40.16%7.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMAX.TO achieves a -15.25% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX.TO's -2.43% return.


QMAX.TO

1D
3.55%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-15.25%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX.TO

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
1.69%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QMAX.TO and SMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX.TO
SMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMAX.TOSMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

1.16

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

1.66

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.89

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.52

7.54

-6.02

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMAX.TO and SMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMAX.TOSMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.16

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.81

-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between QMAX.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, less than SMAX.TO's 14.11% yield.


TTM202520242023
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
11.87%10.79%10.90%2.01%
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.11%14.67%13.88%2.57%

Drawdowns

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than SMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and SMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QMAX.TOSMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-18.22%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-11.37%

-11.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.12%

-4.81%

-15.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-2.20%

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.16%

2.85%

+5.31%

Volatility

QMAX.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) at 4.66%. This indicates that QMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QMAX.TOSMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

4.66%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

9.00%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

17.20%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

14.47%

+9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

14.47%

+9.09%