QMAR vs. RDVY
QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while RDVY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. QMAR is actively managed, while RDVY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QMAR returned 12.12%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for RDVY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QMAR charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
QMAR vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMAR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than RDVY's 11.06% return.
QMAR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- —
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
QMAR vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 13.03% | 10.89% | 16.11% | 35.47% | -16.56% | 12.31% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 11.06% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 16.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMAR and RDVY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between QMAR and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
QMAR vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QMAR
RDVY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QMAR
RDVY
Communication Services
QMAR
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
QMAR
RDVY
Consumer Defensive
QMAR
RDVY
Healthcare
QMAR
RDVY
Industrials
QMAR
RDVY
Utilities
QMAR
RDVY
Basic Materials
QMAR
RDVY
-
Energy
QMAR
RDVY
Financial Services
QMAR
RDVY
Real Estate
QMAR
RDVY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMAR vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
QMAR
RDVY
QMAR vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMAR | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | 1.35 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 3.12 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 52.23 | 13.11 | +39.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMAR | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82 | 2.01 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.67 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
QMAR vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMAR drawdown since its inception was -19.83%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAR and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMAR | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -40.60% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -9.04% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -19.11% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.83% | -25.32% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -5.00% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 2.14% | -1.69% |
Volatility
QMAR vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) is 1.27%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that QMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMAR | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 4.01% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 10.99% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 14.04% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 18.92% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 21.11% | -7.26% |
QMAR vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMAR vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.91% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMAR and RDVY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVY has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to QMAR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMAR dropped -19.83% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 5-year performance, QMAR leads with 12.12% vs 11.26% for RDVY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QMAR has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.
RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.
QMAR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RDVY is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMAR and 0.50% for RDVY.
QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMAR and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer