QLVE vs. SPHQ
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index while SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVE returned 7.60%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for SPHQ. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QLVE having a 12.92% return and SPHQ slightly higher at 13.51%.
QLVE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.76K | $7.65K | $20.86K | |
| $119.48M | $136.23M | $143.26M |
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 12.92% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 4.16% | 4.77% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 13.51% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 8.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and SPHQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QLVE and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
SPHQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
QLVE
SPHQ
Financial Services
QLVE
SPHQ
Communication Services
QLVE
SPHQ
Energy
QLVE
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
SPHQ
Healthcare
QLVE
SPHQ
Industrials
QLVE
SPHQ
Utilities
QLVE
SPHQ
Basic Materials
QLVE
SPHQ
Real Estate
QLVE
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
SPHQ
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.26 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 8.07 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -57.83% | +27.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -8.90% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -16.57% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -25.04% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -6.03% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -10.64% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.49% | +1.02% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.84%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 4.84% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 12.44% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.46% | 14.53% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 16.74% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 17.97% | -1.83% |
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.68% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to SPHQ (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 12.73% vs 7.60% for QLVE. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.
QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer