PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. QLVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than QLVD's 2.66% return.


QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*

QLVD

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.87%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.66%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and QLVD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.66

The correlation between QLVE and QLVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QLVE vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
QLVD

Technology

59.6%
5.0%

Financial Services

38.5%
24.3%

Communication Services

18.4%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.5%

Healthcare

7.6%
10.6%

Energy

7.2%
3.9%

Industrials

7.1%
15.3%

Basic Materials

5.5%
4.3%

Utilities

5.4%
7.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
5.3%

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
QLVD
5.0%

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
QLVD
24.3%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
QLVD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
QLVD
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
QLVD
5.5%

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
QLVD
10.6%

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
QLVD
3.9%

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
QLVD
15.3%

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
QLVD
4.3%

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
QLVD
7.9%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
QLVD
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVEQLVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.12

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

0.87

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

2.58

+9.39

QLVE vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVEQLVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.67

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.48

0.00

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and QLVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVEQLVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-28.20%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-8.15%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-9.24%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-23.99%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-6.19%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-5.24%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.74%

+0.14%

Volatility

QLVE vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) at 3.02%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVEQLVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

3.02%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

8.28%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

10.52%

+5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

11.73%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

13.97%

+1.82%

QLVE vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than QLVD's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.78%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and QLVD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to QLVD (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

On 5-year performance, QLVE leads with 7.43% vs 5.83% for QLVD. On fees, QLVD is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLVE has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVD is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.42% for QLVE.

QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.32% for QLVD.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and QLVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer