PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 6.53% return.


QLVE

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.53%
6M
7.16%
YTD
12.92%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.66%

OUSA

1D
0.11%
1M
1.87%
6M
4.63%
YTD
6.53%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.36%
ALL TIME*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$914.72K$1.31M$1.45M
$2.76K$7.65K$20.86K

QLVE vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
12.92%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.77%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
6.53%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and OUSA is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between QLVE and OUSA has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QLVE vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
OUSA

Technology

35.7%
23.7%

Financial Services

14.3%
18.6%

Communication Services

10.0%
10.3%

Energy

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
13.1%

Healthcare

4.8%
15.1%

Industrials

3.3%
11.9%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

QLVE
35.7%
OUSA
23.7%

Financial Services

QLVE
14.3%
OUSA
18.6%

Communication Services

QLVE
10.0%
OUSA
10.3%

Energy

QLVE
6.3%
OUSA

-

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
6.3%
OUSA
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
4.9%
OUSA
13.1%

Healthcare

QLVE
4.8%
OUSA
15.1%

Industrials

QLVE
3.3%
OUSA
11.9%

Utilities

QLVE
2.7%
OUSA

-

Basic Materials

QLVE
1.9%
OUSA

-

Real Estate

QLVE
0.7%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLVE vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLVEOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.78

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

6.23

+0.29

QLVE vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVEOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-33.12%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-8.36%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-13.14%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

-19.54%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-0.75%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-3.50%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.39%

+1.12%

Volatility

QLVE vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 4.00%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVEOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

4.00%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

8.11%

+9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

10.27%

+9.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

13.38%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.19%

+0.95%

QLVE vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than OUSA's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.36%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.68%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and OUSA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.87% vs 7.60% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.87% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.36% for OUSA.

QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer