QLVE vs. BWET
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLVE is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QLVE returned 18.46%/yr vs 129.64%/yr for BWET. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
QLVE vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.
QLVE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 875.88%
- 6M
- 735.56%
- 1Y
- 1,800.91%
- 3Y*
- 129.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLVE vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 18.06% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 6.49% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 875.88% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and BWET is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between QLVE and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLVE vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
BWET
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QLVE
BWET
-
Financial Services
QLVE
BWET
Communication Services
QLVE
BWET
-
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
BWET
-
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
BWET
-
Healthcare
QLVE
BWET
-
Energy
QLVE
BWET
-
Industrials
QLVE
BWET
-
Basic Materials
QLVE
BWET
-
Utilities
QLVE
BWET
-
Real Estate
QLVE
BWET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
BWET
QLVE vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLVE | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.96 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 59.51 | -56.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.97 | 158.07 | -146.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLVE | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 18.57 | -16.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.90 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -56.90% | +26.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -30.64% | +19.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -56.90% | +43.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -11.29% | +10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -24.09% | +15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 11.51% | -8.63% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) is 6.82%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that QLVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 33.96% | -27.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 88.49% | -73.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 98.35% | -81.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 70.45% | -56.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 70.45% | -54.66% |
QLVE vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.42% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to QLVE (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 18.46% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QLVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 18.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
QLVE is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BWET is Commodities. QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer