PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.


QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*

BWET

1D
4.26%
1M
9.15%
YTD
875.88%
6M
735.56%
1Y
1,800.91%
3Y*
129.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%6.49%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
875.88%96.22%-39.21%15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and BWET is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023

0.01

The correlation between QLVE and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QLVE vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
BWET

Technology

59.6%

-

Financial Services

38.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

18.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%

-

Healthcare

7.6%

-

Energy

7.2%

-

Industrials

7.1%

-

Basic Materials

5.5%

-

Utilities

5.4%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
BWET

-

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
BWET
8.6%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
BWET

-

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
BWET

-

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
BWET

-

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
BWET

-

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
BWET

-

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
BWET

-

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
BWET

-

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
BWET

-

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
BWET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVEBWETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.96

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

59.51

-56.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

158.07

-146.10

QLVE vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVEBWETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

18.57

-16.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.90

-1.42

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVEBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-56.90%

+26.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-30.64%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-56.90%

+43.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-11.29%

+10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-24.09%

+15.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

11.51%

-8.63%

Volatility

QLVE vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) is 6.82%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that QLVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVEBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

33.96%

-27.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

88.49%

-73.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

98.35%

-81.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

70.45%

-56.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

70.45%

-54.66%

QLVE vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to QLVE (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs BWET's -56.90%.

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 18.46% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QLVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 18.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

QLVE is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BWET is Commodities. QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 3.50% for BWET.

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer