QLVD vs. SKOR
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QLVD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 5.87%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for SKOR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SKOR.
Performance
QLVD vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.45% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 8.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
QLVD vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.90% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.26% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.45% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and SKOR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, QLVD and SKOR have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
SKOR
QLVD vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.18 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 7.51 | -4.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and SKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -15.98% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -2.09% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -3.11% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -15.13% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -0.67% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -2.64% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 0.61% | +2.38% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.84%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 0.84% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 2.07% | +6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 2.72% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 4.43% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 4.90% | +9.05% |
QLVD vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than SKOR's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 3.12% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.66% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and SKOR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to SKOR (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs SKOR's -15.98%.
On 5-year performance, QLVD leads with 5.87% vs 1.78% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLVD has performed better with a 5.87% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.12% for QLVD.
QLVD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.22% for SKOR.
SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and SKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer