PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVD vs. DVQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than DVQQ's 21.39% return.


QLVD

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.87%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*

DVQQ

1D
-0.37%
1M
14.84%
YTD
21.39%
6M
18.25%
1Y
49.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QLVD and DVQQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVD vs. DVQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DVQQ
DVQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DVQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DVQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVDDVQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.36

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.80

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

9.21

-6.63

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the DVQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVD and DVQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVDDVQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

2.19

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.88

-0.40

Drawdowns

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, which is greater than DVQQ's maximum drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and DVQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVDDVQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.20%

-25.09%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-17.89%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-0.37%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-7.16%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

5.43%

-2.69%

Volatility

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 3.02%, while WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVDDVQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

6.29%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

16.08%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

22.86%

-12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

24.37%

-12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.97%

24.37%

-10.40%

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DVQQ's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVD vs. DVQQ - Dividend Comparison

QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DVQQ's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DVQQ
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.78%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVD and DVQQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVQQ has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to QLVD (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs DVQQ's -25.09%.

On 1-year performance, DVQQ leads with 49.85% vs 7.04% for QLVD. On fees, QLVD is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVQQ has performed better with a 49.85% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVD is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DVQQ.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.03% for DVQQ.

QLVD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while DVQQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while DVQQ tracks Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.94% for DVQQ.

DVQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVD and DVQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer